Skip to content Skip to navigation

UN Human Rights Council concered over #CAB

We are concerned that India's new Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2019 is fundamentally discriminatory in nature.

The amended legislation seeks to expedite citizenship for religious minorities – naming specifically only Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians - fleeing persecution in Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan, who have been resident before 2014. But it does not extend the same protection to Muslims, including minority sects.

Press briefing on India

Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights:  Jeremy Laurence

Location: Geneva

Date: 13 December 2019

Subject: India

The amended law would appear to undermine the commitment to equality before the law enshrined in India's constitution and India's obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, to which Indian is a State party, which prohibit discrimination based on racial, ethnic or religious grounds.  Although India's broader naturalization laws remain in place, these amendments will have a discriminatory effect on people's access to nationality.

All migrants, regardless of their migration status, are entitled to respect, protection and fulfilment of their human rights. Just 12 months ago India endorsed the Global Compact for Safe, Regular and Orderly Migration, which commits States to respond to the needs of migrants in situations of vulnerability, avoiding arbitrary detention and collective expulsions and ensuring that all migration governance measures are human rights-based.

While the goal of protecting persecuted groups is welcome, this should be done through a robust national asylum system that is premised on the principle of equality and non-discrimination, and which applies to all people in need of protection from persecution and other human rights violations, with no distinction as to race, religion, national origin or other prohibited grounds.

We understand the new law will be reviewed by the Supreme Court of India and hope it will consider carefully the compatibility of the law with India's international human rights obligations.

In the meantime, we are concerned at reports that two people have died and many including police officers have been injured in the Indian states of Assam and Tripura as people protest against the Act. We call on the authorities to respect the right to peaceful assembly, and to abide by international norms and standards on the use of force when responding to protests. All sides should refrain from resorting to violence.

Author info

admin's picture

Add new comment

Random Stories

Assam archers to shine in Teipei

8 Aug 2015 - 5:05pm | Hantigiri Narzary
Two archers from Assam- Sanjay Boro and Himani Boro will respresent India along with four others at the  Asian Archery Taipei Open Tournament to be held at Chinese Taipei from 9 August to 18...

UDLF militant killed in Karimganj

14 Oct 2012 - 4:22am | editor
Army killed an United Democratic Liberation Front militant caught another in Karimganj district on Saturday. Acting on a tip off, army conducted an operation near Munaphichherra area in the...

Akhil blames Gogoi for Maoist activities

16 May 2012 - 2:35am | editor
RTI Akhil Gogoi has blamed Tarun Gogoi alleging that the Chief Minister has created space for Maoist groups to operate in the state. Addressing a press conference in Guwahati, he said that the...

CM Sonowal’s First Major Test: Bodoland Council’s Land Allotment for Patanjali Trust

26 May 2016 - 2:22pm | Ahmed Mohiuddin Siddiqui
Assam’s newly sworn-in Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal is in for a major political test, which will guage the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)’s resolve and claims of fostering development in Assam....